Mastering the Finmagine Financial Chart Builder

The Analyst's Manual: A Definitive Deep Dive Into All Five Tabs — Charts, Quick Analysis, Calculated Ratios, Price Analysis & Valuation

COMPLETE v2.2.0 TUTORIAL
Published: February 13, 2026 | Updated: February 13, 2026 | 30 min read | Comprehensive Tutorial

Multimedia Learning Hub

Master every feature of the Finmagine Financial Chart Builder through video, audio, comprehensive overview, and interactive knowledge testing

Complete Learning Path

This is the definitive tutorial for version 2.2.0 of the Finmagine Financial Chart Builder Chrome extension. It goes beyond the basics to cover every tab, every button, every customization, and every analytical technique built into the tool. Whether you use Screener.in for Indian equities or Google Finance for global stocks, this guide transforms you from a first-time user into a power analyst.

What You Will Master:

  • Tab 1 — Charts: Dual-axis visualization, metric persistence, Select All, Clear All, Reset Preferences, 10-color palette, bar/line auto-detection, and the Google Finance Minimize-Restore workflow
  • Tab 2 — Quick Analysis: Sector-aware health scoring (0–100), strengths/concerns engine, CAGR analysis, YoY/QoQ trend analysis, shareholding movement tracking, and the Settings modal with 3 strictness presets and individual threshold sliders
  • Tab 3 — Calculated Ratios: 11+ derived solvency, profitability, and efficiency ratios, DuPont Analysis (ROE decomposition), the color-coded Excellent/Good/Average/Poor rating system, and formula transparency on hover
  • Tab 4 — Price Analysis: Price vs Fundamentals comparison with CATCHING UP / FAIRLY VALUED / RUNNING AHEAD verdicts, Cyclical Quarter Analysis with seasonal rankings, 52-week Risk Metrics with Max Drawdown, and the CAGR comparison table across 4 time horizons
  • Tab 5 — Valuation: 4 historical multiples (PE, EV/EBITDA, P/B, Mkt Cap/Sales) vs 5-year median, sector-aware weighted verdicts across 19 sectors, PEG Ratio with growth-adjusted interpretation, NIFTY 50 Benchmark comparison, relevance tags, and dimmed card logic
  • Panel Controls: Width Toggle (Normal 1100px / Wide 1400px), Refresh button, Minimize/Restore, Finmagine header branding, and the Powered by Finmagine watermark
  • Google Finance Protocol: The single-view limitation, auto-detection indicators, MutationObserver auto-refresh, and the Select View First golden rule

Who This Tutorial Is For:

  • Indian equity investors using Screener.in for fundamental research
  • Global stock analysts using Google Finance for US, European, and Asian equities
  • Finance students learning DuPont Analysis, valuation multiples, and ratio interpretation
  • Value investors seeking sector-aware undervaluation signals
  • Growth investors wanting to validate PE multiples with PEG ratios
  • Anyone who has stared at a wall of numbers on Screener.in and wished for clarity

The Ultimate Stock Valuation Framework | Deep Dive

Watch a comprehensive deep dive into the Valuation tab's 4-layer framework — historical context, sector-specific weighted scoring, PEG growth sanity checks, and NIFTY 50 market benchmarks — with real company examples.

Video: The Ultimate Stock Valuation Framework | Finmagine Financial Chart Builder v2.2.0 Deep Dive

Complete video demonstration featuring Affle India, National Aluminium, Bajaj Finance, and more

Listen to the Audio Deep Dive

Prefer to listen? This comprehensive audio walkthrough covers the complete v2.2.0 feature set — from installation through all five tabs — with real-world investment analysis examples.

Duration: Full deep dive | Format: Professional narration

Deep dive audio exploring the 4-pillar valuation framework, sector-weighted verdicts, PEG ratios, and NIFTY benchmarks

Test Your Knowledge — 74 Flashcards

Click any flashcard to reveal the answer. Use the search box to filter by topic. These cover every tab, every metric, every threshold, and every workflow in the extension.

Table of Contents

  1. The Wall of Numbers Problem — and the 5-Tab Solution
  2. Installation & Architecture
  3. Panel Controls & Width Toggle
  4. Tab 1: Charts — The Visualization Engine
  5. Tab 2: Quick Analysis — Instant Health Diagnostics
  6. Tab 3: Calculated Ratios — The Engine Room
  7. Tab 4: Price Analysis — Timing the Entry
  8. Tab 5: Valuation — The Decision Engine
  9. Sector Intelligence in Action — 7 Companies, 3 Verdicts
  10. The 5-Tab Workflow in Action: Affle (India) Ltd
  11. The Complete Analyst Workflow & Speed Screening
  12. Troubleshooting & FAQ

The Wall of Numbers Problem — and the 5-Tab Solution

If you have ever sat in front of Screener.in or Google Finance at 11 PM, staring at row after row of financial data, trying to mentally subtract column C from column F while remembering what was in column A, you know the feeling. Your eyes glaze over. Your brain does mental gymnastics just to spot a trend. After 10 minutes of scrolling, the cognitive load is so overwhelming that you miss the very signals you were looking for.

That is exactly where the Finmagine Financial Chart Builder enters the picture. It is a free Chrome extension that shatters that wall of numbers in milliseconds. But version 2.2.0 goes far beyond simple charting. It delivers a complete, five-tab analytical workflow that takes you from raw data to a confident investment decision:

  1. Charts Tab — The Crime Scene: What actually happened? What do the numbers say?
  2. Quick Analysis Tab — The Background Check: Is this company reliable? Does it have a good history?
  3. Calculated Ratios Tab — The Forensics Lab: How exactly did they achieve their results? What is the hidden mechanism?
  4. Price Analysis Tab — The Evidence: Is the price of admission justified by the underlying value?
  5. Valuation Tab — The Verdict: What does the market say? How does this compare to its own history and the broader market?
Finmagine Financial Chart Builder v2.2.0: The Analyst's Manual covering all five tabs — Charts, Quick Analysis, Calculated Ratios, Price Analysis, and Valuation
The Finmagine Workflow Summary: Five tabs, their icons, core functions, best use cases, and platform support

Here is the logical progression of the five tabs:

Tab Icon Core Question Data Source Screener.in Google Finance
Charts What does the financial data look like visually? DOM extraction Yes Yes
Quick Analysis 📊 How healthy is this company, sector-adjusted? DOM extraction Yes No
Calculated Ratios 🧮 What do the derived financial ratios reveal? DOM extraction Yes No
Price Analysis 📈 Is the price justified by fundamentals? DOM extraction Yes No
Valuation 💎 Is the stock cheap or expensive vs its own history? Screener.in API Yes No
The Analytical Ladder: Start with Charts to see the data. Move to Quick Analysis to diagnose health. Use Calculated Ratios to understand why. Check Price Analysis to time your entry. Finish with Valuation to make the buy/wait decision. Each tab builds on the insight from the previous one.
SETUP

Installation & Architecture

The Finmagine Financial Chart Builder is a free Chrome extension with zero configuration required. It works on Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Brave, and all Chromium-based browsers.

Installation Steps

  1. Visit the Chrome Web Store: Search for "Finmagine Financial Chart Builder" or click here for the direct link
  2. Click "Add to Chrome" and confirm the installation
  3. Navigate to a company page on Screener.in or click "Financials" on Google Finance
  4. Click the golden "Visualize with Finmagine" button (bottom-right corner)
Architecture and UI Shell: Privacy-first client-side processing with DOM extraction, local processing engine, and visualization layer. Panel width toggle between Normal (1100px) and Wide (1400px)

Privacy-First Architecture

Every computation — from health scores to DuPont Analysis to valuation verdicts — runs entirely in your browser. The extension never sends your financial research data to any external server. Think of it as having a financial analyst sitting inside your browser tab, reading the same page you see, and computing everything locally in real time.

Zero Data Exfiltration: The extension operates under a strict client-side-only model. Your research stays yours. No accounts, no tracking, no server dependencies. The only network calls are to the Screener.in Chart API (for the Valuation tab), and even those responses are processed locally and never relayed elsewhere.

Platform Support

Screener.in (India): All five tabs available. Screener delivers server-rendered static HTML, so the extension extracts up to 8 data sections simultaneously: Quarterly P&L, Annual P&L, Quarterly Balance Sheet, Annual Balance Sheet, Quarterly Cash Flow, Annual Cash Flow, Financial Ratios, and Shareholding Pattern.

Google Finance (Global): Charts tab only. Google Finance is a React single-page application that shows only one financial statement at a time. The extension adapts with auto-detection, a Refresh button, MutationObserver auto-refresh, and the Minimize-Restore workflow for switching views.

CONTROLS

Panel Controls & Width Toggle

Before diving into the five tabs, let's master the panel itself. Every tab shares the same shell, and understanding the controls will make your workflow faster.

Panel States

StateDescriptionHow to Access
ClosedPanel hidden, golden float button visibleClick X or outside panel
MinimizedThin bar docked at bottom showing metric countClick Minimize button
ExpandedFull panel, viewport-centeredClick float button or minimized bar

Header Controls (Left to Right)

Chart Section Controls

Pro Tip: Think of "Clear All" as clearing your desk for a new project — your favorite tools are still in the drawer. "Reset Preferences" is moving to a brand new office.
TAB 1

Charts — The Visualization Engine

The Charts tab is the foundation of the extension and the only tab available on both Screener.in and Google Finance. It transforms financial data tables into interactive, dual-axis charts with a single click.

Tab 1: The Visualization Engine — solving the scale problem with dual-axis logic. Absolute values as bars on the left Y-axis, percentages as lines on the right Y-axis

Screener.in: 8 Data Sections at Once

When you open the panel on Screener.in, the extension has already extracted up to 8 distinct data sections from the page. All are available simultaneously — no tab switching required:

SectionPeriodExample Metrics
Quarterly Profit & Loss12+ quartersSales, Expenses, Operating Profit, OPM%, Net Profit, EPS
Quarterly Balance Sheet12+ quartersEquity, Reserves, Borrowings, Fixed Assets
Quarterly Cash Flow12+ quartersCash from Operations, Investing, Financing
Annual Profit & Loss10+ yearsSame as quarterly but full fiscal year data
Annual Balance Sheet10+ yearsTotal Assets, Net Worth, Working Capital
Annual Cash Flow10+ yearsFree Cash Flow, Operating CF, Financing CF
Financial Ratios10+ yearsROCE, ROE, Current Ratio, Debt/Equity
Shareholding PatternRecent quartersPromoter %, FII %, DII %, Public %

Selecting Metrics

Click the checkbox next to any metric name. The chart updates in real time with smooth animations — no "Generate" or "Submit" button needed. You can mix metrics from different sections on the same chart. Want quarterly Revenue alongside annual ROCE? Just check both. The extension creates a unified chronological X-axis.

Dual-Axis System

This is the core innovation that makes the charts actually useful. If you plot Revenue (₹20,000 Cr) and OPM% (27%) on the same axis, the 27% becomes an invisible flat line at the bottom. The extension solves this automatically:

Auto Chart Type Detection

The system determines chart type from the metric name:

Color Palette

A 10-color palette (Blue, Red, Green, Orange, Purple, Teal, Dark Orange, Light Blue, Crimson, Emerald) assigns colors in order. Beyond 10 metrics, colors repeat. For readability, 3–5 metrics per chart is recommended; maximum is 10.

Advanced Charting Workflows: Metric Aliasing maps 'Sales' to 'Revenue' across companies. Timeframe Mixing combines Quarterly and Annual on one chart. Memory and Reset controls for metric persistence

Metric Persistence (v2.1.0+)

Your metric selections are automatically saved and restored when you navigate to a different company. If you select Revenue, Net Profit, and OPM% on TCS, then navigate to Infosys, those same metrics will be pre-selected if Infosys has matching data.

Metric Aliasing

Companies are not always consistent with their terminology. One calls it "Sales," another calls it "Revenue," a third uses "Net Sales." Finmagine handles this with a built-in thesaurus:

These Terms Are EquivalentCanonical Name
Sales, Revenue, Net Sales, TurnoverRevenue
Net Profit, PAT, Profit After Tax, Net IncomeNet Profit
Operating Profit, EBIT, PBITOperating Profit
OPM %, Operating Margin %, Operating MarginOPM %
EPS, Earnings Per Share, Diluted EPSEPS

This means your preferences seamlessly carry across companies that use different naming conventions.

Section Context

Metrics are saved with their section context. Annual P&L "Revenue" only restores to Annual P&L "Revenue" — it won't accidentally pre-select the Quarterly version. This prevents data confusion.

Site-Specific Storage

Screener.in and Google Finance have separate preference storage. Your Screener selections don't affect Google Finance and vice versa.

Google Finance: The Minimize-Restore Protocol

The Google Finance Protocol: 4-step Minimize-Restore cycle for switching views. Golden Rule: Always select your Statement and Period BEFORE opening the visualizer

Before we dive into the Google Finance workflow, there is one important thing to understand: Screener.in is a buffet — everything is laid out on one long page. Google Finance is a vending machine — you push a button to see one specific thing at a time. This architectural difference is why Google Finance shows only one statement at a time, and the extension adapts with a specialized workflow:

The Golden Rule

Always select your Statement type (Income Statement, Balance Sheet, or Cash Flow) and Period (Quarterly or Annual) on Google Finance BEFORE clicking "Visualize with Finmagine". The extension extracts whatever is currently visible.

The Minimize-Restore Cycle (4 Steps)

  1. Minimize the panel (click Minimize button)
  2. Switch the view on Google Finance (change statement tab or period toggle)
  3. Wait 2–3 seconds for React to render the new data
  4. Click the minimized bar to restore — auto-refresh fires automatically

Google Finance Interface Differences

Charting Recipes for Google Finance

The Profitability Trend (Income Statement, Quarterly)

Select Revenue, Operating Income, and Net Income. Look for compression — if Revenue bars climb nicely but Operating and Net Income bars stay flat or shrink, costs are eating the growth. This pattern reveals margin erosion that a quick glance at the financial table often misses.

The Buyback Detection (Income Statement, Annual)

Select Net Income and EPS. In companies like Apple, Google, or Microsoft that do massive buybacks, you will see EPS climbing much faster than Net Income. That divergence is pure financial engineering — they are reducing the denominator (shares outstanding) rather than growing the numerator (actual profits). Finmagine's dual-axis chart makes this divergence instantly visible.

Interactive Features

Analytical Workflow: Select 5–6 metrics to get the full picture, then use the interactive legend to hide all but one baseline metric (like Revenue). Reveal additional metrics one at a time, asking "How does this relate to the baseline?" This progressive revelation technique prevents analysis paralysis.

Real-World Examples

Here is the Charts tab in action on two different platforms:

Screener.in — Adani Green Energy (Annual P&L)

Sales, OPM%, and Profit Before Tax charted together on a dual-axis view. Bars show absolute values (left axis), while the OPM% line tracks margin trends on the right axis. Notice how Sales grew exponentially from 28 Cr to 12,499 Cr while OPM climbed from 68% to 82%.

Adani Green Energy: Charts tab showing Annual P&L with Sales bars, OPM% line, and Profit Before Tax — dual-axis visualization on Screener.in

Screener.in — Adani Enterprises (Annual Balance Sheet)

Reserves vs Borrowings comparison revealing the capital structure evolution. This chart instantly shows how borrowings surged past reserves from 2021 onward — a red flag that warrants further analysis in the Calculated Ratios tab.

Adani Enterprises: Charts tab showing Annual Balance Sheet — Reserves vs Borrowings comparison revealing capital structure changes

Google Finance — Uber (Annual Income Statement)

Revenue, EBITDA, and Net Profit Margin charted on Google Finance. The dual-axis logic works identically — Revenue and EBITDA as bars, NPM% as a line. Uber's turnaround from negative margins to 19.33% NPM is immediately visible.

Uber on Google Finance: Annual Income Statement showing Revenue and EBITDA bars with Net Profit Margin line — dual-axis chart revealing Uber's profitability turnaround

Google Finance — Uber (Annual Cash Flow)

Cash from Operations and Free Cash Flow showing Uber's dramatic FCF inflection. From $152M in 2021 to $6.48B in 2025 — a story that only a chart can tell at a glance.

Uber on Google Finance: Annual Cash Flow showing Cash from Operations line and Free Cash Flow bars — dramatic FCF growth from $152M to $6.48B
TAB 2

Quick Analysis — Instant Health Diagnostics

Quick Analysis transforms 10+ years of financial statements into a single health score with sector-aware intelligence. It answers: "How healthy is this company?" in under one second. Available on Screener.in only (requires 10+ years of P&L data).

Tab 2: Quick Analysis — Instant Health Diagnostics and Sector Logic. Health Score of 78 (Good), 2 Strengths, 0 Concerns. ROCE 9%, OPM 15%. Algorithm Weights: Growth 30%, Profitability 30%, Stability 25%, Shareholding 15%. Sector Detection dynamically swaps header metrics for banking

Health Score Algorithm

The circular health score indicator (0–100) is a composite weighted score:

ComponentWeightWhat It Measures
Growth30%Revenue CAGR, Profit CAGR across multiple time horizons
Profitability30%ROE, ROCE, Operating Profit Margin
Stability25%Debt/Equity, Interest Coverage, Cash Flow consistency
Shareholding15%Promoter holding level, pledge status, institutional trends
Score RangeLabelColorInterpretation
80–100ExcellentGreenOutstanding financial health
65–79GoodLight GreenSolid financial position
50–64AverageYellowAcceptable, monitor closely
35–49Below AverageOrangeSignificant concerns
0–34PoorRedMajor financial stress

Key Metrics in Header

The header row displays key ratios alongside the health score for quick reference: ROCE, OPM, ROE, and D/E. For Banking/NBFC companies, these dynamically swap to NIM (Net Interest Margin), GNPA (Gross NPA), CASA ratio, and ROA. Each metric shows a trend arrow: ↑ Green (improving), ↓ Red (declining), → Gray (stable).

Sector Detection

The extension auto-detects the company's sector from the Peer Comparison breadcrumb on Screener.in. It recognizes 18 sectors plus a General fallback. Sector detection drives the entire analysis — threshold adjustments, special handling rules, and metric selection.

Strengths & Concerns Engine

The left column lists positive characteristics (green check marks) and risk flags (red warnings):

Growth (CAGR) Analysis

Compound Annual Growth Rates across four time horizons: 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y for Revenue, Profit, and EPS. Color-coded: Green (≥15%), Gray (5–15%), Red (<5%). The pattern across timeframes reveals the growth trajectory:

PatternExampleInterpretation
Accelerating1Y: 25%, 5Y: 15%Growth is speeding up (bullish)
Decelerating1Y: 5%, 5Y: 20%Growth is slowing (watch closely)
Consistent1Y: 18%, 5Y: 17%Stable, predictable growth
Volatile1Y: -5%, 5Y: 25%Erratic, needs investigation
Trends and Customization: Quarterly YoY and QoQ trends with direction arrows, yearly trends, and the Settings Engine with Conservative, Moderate, and Aggressive strictness presets plus manual override sliders

Quarterly Trends (YoY) — Primary

Year-over-Year comparison removes seasonality: Q3 FY26 vs Q3 FY25 vs Q3 FY24. Shows Sales, Net Profit, OPM%, EPS direction with ↑ (Increasing/Green), ↓ (Decreasing/Red), ↔ (Inconsistent/Yellow).

Quarterly Momentum (QoQ) — Secondary

Sequential quarter comparison (Q3 → Q2 → Q1) shows recent momentum. Good for detecting turning points but noisy due to seasonality.

Yearly Trends

Annual comparison for structural analysis: Sales, Net Profit, OPM%, EPS, Reserves, Net Cash Flow, Operating CF, ROCE.

Shareholding Movement

Tracks Promoter, FII, DII, and Public ownership changes over recent quarters. Shows direction (↑/↓/→), duration ("4 qtrs"), and current level. Key warning signs: Promoter declining 4+ quarters, both FII and DII selling simultaneously, high pledge percentage.

Settings Modal

Click the gear icon to open Settings. Three components:

1. Sector Override

Auto-detect (recommended) or manual selection from 18 sectors. Use manual override for conglomerates or when the breadcrumb misclassifies the company.

2. Strictness Presets (One-Click)

PresetPhilosophyBest For
ConservativeStrict standards, fewer false positivesBlue-chip, established companies
Moderate (default)Balanced approachGeneral analysis
AggressiveLenient standards, growth-focusedStartups, turnaround stories

How Thresholds Shift Across Presets

MetricConservativeModerateAggressive
Revenue/Profit CAGR Min20%15%10%
ROE / ROCE Min20%15%12%
OPM Min15%10%8%
D/E Max (Non-Banking)0.5x1.0x1.5x
GNPA Max (Banking)2.0%3.0%4.0%
Promoter Pledge Max5%10%20%
Practical Example: A company with 12% Sales Growth and 1.2x D/E scores "Weak + High Risk" in Conservative mode (Growth < 20%, Debt > 0.5x). The same company scores "Strong + Acceptable" in Aggressive mode (Growth > 10%, Debt < 1.5x). Same company, completely different verdict.

3. Individual Threshold Sliders

Fine-tune after selecting a preset. Adjustable thresholds include: Revenue CAGR Min, Profit CAGR Min, ROE Min, ROCE Min, OPM Min, D/E Max, Current Ratio Min, Promoter Min, Pledge Max, and banking-specific NIM Min, GNPA Max, CASA Min. Click "Apply & Re-analyze" to save and refresh. Settings persist in browser localStorage.

Banking/NBFC Special Handling

Critical for Banks: The analysis engine automatically adjusts for lending businesses. High Debt/Equity is not flagged (leverage is the business model). Negative operating cash flow is not flagged (cash is lending raw material). FCF analysis is skipped entirely. Focus shifts to NIM, NPA trends, CASA ratio, and ROE consistency.
TAB 3

Calculated Ratios — The Engine Room

Unlike Quick Analysis (which reads pre-calculated ratios from Screener.in), the Calculated Ratios tab derives 11+ ratios from raw P&L and Balance Sheet data. This means it works on ANY company on Screener.in — not just the 72 covered on finmagine.com. Available on Screener.in only.

Tab 3: Calculated Ratios — The Engine Room. DuPont Analysis decomposes ROE: Net Profit Margin 16.9% (Good) x Asset Turnover 0.66x (Poor) x Equity Multiplier 1.20x (Excellent) = Calculated ROE 13.5% (Excellent). Logic: Computes 11+ ratios from raw P&L and Balance Sheet. Transparency: Hover for exact formulas
Ratio Categories and The Rating System: Solvency and Liquidity (Interest Coverage, Debt to Equity, Debt to Assets, Quick Ratio), Profitability (EBITDA, Net Profit Margin), Efficiency (Asset Turnover, Fixed Asset Turnover). Rating thresholds: Green = Excellent, Lime = Good, Yellow = Average, Red = Poor, Blue = Info

Solvency & Liquidity Ratios

RatioFormulaExcellentGoodAveragePoor
Interest CoverageOperating Profit / Interest Expense≥5.0x3.0–5.0x2.0–3.0x<2.0x
Debt to EquityTotal Borrowings / Shareholders' Equity≤1.0x or Debt-free1.0–1.5x1.5–2.5x>2.5x
Debt to AssetsTotal Borrowings / Total Assets≤20%20–40%40–60%>60%
Current RatioCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities≥2.0x1.5–2.0x1.0–1.5x<1.0x
Quick Ratio(Current Assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities≥1.5x1.0–1.5x0.8–1.0x<0.8x

The Quick Ratio (Acid Test) is particularly powerful. It asks a brutally simple question: If your sales stopped tomorrow and you could not sell a single piece of inventory, could you still pay off all your immediate debts? If a company has a high Current Ratio but a low Quick Ratio, it may be hoarding unsold stock to make its balance sheet look healthier than it is.

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios

RatioFormulaExcellentGoodAveragePoor
EBITDAOperating Profit + DepreciationInfo only (absolute value, no rating)
EBITDA MarginEBITDA / Revenue × 100≥40%25–40%15–25%<15%
Net Profit MarginNet Profit / Revenue × 100≥20%10–20%5–10%<5%
Asset TurnoverRevenue / Total Assets≥3.0x2.0–3.0x1.0–2.0x<1.0x
Fixed Asset TurnoverRevenue / Fixed Assets≥10.0x5.0–10.0x2.5–5.0x<2.5x
Equity MultiplierTotal Assets / Shareholders' Equity≤1.5x1.5–2.5x2.5–4.0x>4.0x

DuPont Analysis: ROE Decomposition

The crown jewel of the Calculated Ratios tab. DuPont Analysis decomposes Return on Equity into three drivers:

ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier

This formula reveals where the returns come from. A 25% ROE could be driven by high margins (quality), efficient asset use (operational excellence), or high leverage (debt risk). The DuPont decomposition tells you which one, and that distinction changes the entire investment thesis.
Company ProfileNPMAsset TurnoverEquity MultiplierInterpretation
Quality CompounderHighModerateLowSustainable, low-risk ROE — the ideal
Efficient OperatorModerateHighModerateGood capital utilization
Leveraged GrowthLowLowHighROE inflated by debt — risky
Turnaround CandidateLowLowLowPoor across all dimensions

The tab also compares the DuPont-calculated ROE against Screener.in's reported ROE. A difference under 2% shows "Matches" (verified). Larger differences are labeled "Slight difference" — typically due to averaging or timing.

Formula Transparency: Hover over any ratio card to see its exact calculation formula. This makes the tab a powerful learning tool for finance students and new investors.

DuPont for Banks: Read with Caution

The Calculated Ratios tab uses universal formulas — it does NOT adjust for sector. This means a bank will always show a high Equity Multiplier (rated "Poor" in red) because banks are inherently leveraged. This is expected and normal. Cross-reference the Quick Analysis tab (which does adjust for banking) to confirm the leverage is being managed safely via NIM and GNPA.

Quick Analysis vs. Calculated Ratios: When to Use Which

AspectQuick Analysis (Tab 2)Calculated Ratios (Tab 3)
RoleThe Dashboard — tells you if a company is healthyThe Diagnostics Tool — tells you why
Primary OutputHealth Score (0–100)11+ Financial Ratios
Sector AwarenessYes — auto-detects and adjustsNo — universal formulas (user provides context)
Unique FeatureShareholding Tracker, Trend AnalysisDuPont Analysis
Customization3 strictness presets + individual slidersFixed formulas and standard thresholds
Use First?Yes — get the "pass/fail" verdict firstSecond — investigate the "why" behind the score
TAB 4

Price Analysis — Timing the Entry

Price Analysis answers the critical question: "Is the current stock price justified by fundamental growth?" It combines Price vs Fundamentals comparison, Cyclical Quarter Analysis, and 52-Week Risk Metrics into a single view. Available on Screener.in only.

Tab 4: Price Analysis — Tracking tight. Price vs Fundamentals shows CATCHING UP verdict when profit growth (53%) outpaces price growth (25%). Price/Profit Growth Ratio of 0.47x. Verdict Engine: Catching Up (Green) = Ratio < 0.7x = Undervalued signal. Fairly Valued (Blue) = 0.7x to 1.3x. Running Ahead (Red) = Ratio > 1.3x = Overvalued signal

Price vs Fundamentals Panel

Valuation Status Badges

BadgeColorConditionInterpretation
CATCHING UPGreenPrice CAGR < Profit CAGR × 0.7Fundamentals outpacing price — potential undervaluation
FAIRLY VALUEDBluePrice ≈ Profit growth (±30%)Price and profits aligned
RUNNING AHEADRedPrice CAGR > Profit CAGR × 1.3Price ahead of fundamentals — potential overvaluation
The Flipped Script: Sometimes "high" is actually cheap. If a stock is hitting a 52-week high but its profits are growing even faster, it might still be "Catching Up." And sometimes "low" is extremely expensive — if profits are collapsing faster than the price. As Warren Buffett said: "Price is what you pay, value is what you get."

Price/Profit Growth Ratio

Calculated as Stock Price CAGR / Profit CAGR. Below 0.7x = significantly undervalued. Between 0.7–1.3x = fairly valued. Above 1.3x = potentially overvalued. Uses 5Y data primarily, falls back to 3Y.

CAGR Comparison Table

Shows Stock Price CAGR, Profit CAGR, and Sales CAGR across 10Y, 5Y, 3Y, and 1Y horizons. Look for: Price consistently above Profit (multiple expansion), 1Y Price CAGR >> 5Y (recent rally needing verification), or 1Y Profit CAGR >> 1Y Price CAGR (accelerating fundamentals not yet reflected in price).

Cyclical Quarter Analysis

Cyclicality and Risk Metrics: Seasonal Ranking identifies strong and weak quarters based on history. Trigger Logic: >30% variance in quarterly profits flags CYCLICAL badge. 52-Week Range position marker and Max Drawdown calculation

This panel identifies seasonal patterns by grouping quarterly profits by month (Mar, Jun, Sep, Dec), calculating average profit per quarter type, and measuring variance. If variance exceeds 30% of the mean, the company is flagged as CYCLICAL.

Quarter Performance Ranking

Quarters are ranked #1 through #4 by average profitability. Color-coded: #1 Dark Green (strongest), #2 Light Green, #3 Yellow, #4 Red/Brown (weakest). Positive Quarters have ≥70% historical positive profits. Negative Quarters have ≥50% historical negative profits.

Timing Purchases: For cyclical companies, plan purchases BEFORE the strong quarters. If March is #1 and December is #4, buying in October/November positions you for the strongest quarter ahead. Avoid buying right before historically weak quarters.

Typical Strongest Quarters by Industry

IndustryTypically Strongest QuarterDriver
InfrastructureQ4 (March)Government spending/billing before fiscal year-end
Retail / FMCGQ3 (Oct–Dec)Diwali, festive season, Christmas
AutoQ2 (Sep) and Q4 (Mar)Festive demand + year-end incentives
AgricultureSeasonalHarvest cycles and monsoon patterns

52-Week Risk Metrics

BadgeColorConditionInterpretation
Near 52W HighYellowWithin 10% of 52W highPotentially expensive entry
Mid RangeBlueBetween extremesNeutral positioning
Near 52W LowGreenWithin 20% of 52W lowCould be value opportunity or falling knife

The visual 52-week range bar shows current price position between the yearly low and high. Three metrics are displayed: Max Drawdown ((High-Low)/High), From 52W High (how far below peak), and From 52W Low (how far above trough).

Max Drawdown Strategy

DrawdownRisk LevelStrategy
< 20%LowSafe to buy on momentum. Corrections are shallow.
20–40%ModerateNormal volatility. Standard entry rules apply.
40–60%HighAvoid buying at peaks. Wait for deep pullbacks.
> 60%Very HighExtreme volatility. Requires strict stop-losses.

The Falling Knife Distinction

When a stock is "Near 52W Low," is it a bargain or a trap? The answer lies in combining the price position with profit momentum:

The Decision Matrix: Buy when the price is falling but profits are rising (divergence). Avoid when the price is falling because profits are also falling (convergence).

Composite Signal Patterns

The most powerful insights come from combining multiple Price Analysis metrics:

TAB 5

Valuation — The Decision Engine

The Valuation tab is the most sophisticated feature in the extension and the first to use an API-based data source. It fetches 5 years of daily historical valuation data via the Screener.in Chart API, computes 5-year medians client-side, applies sector-aware weighted verdicts, calculates PEG ratios, and benchmarks against NIFTY 50. Available on Screener.in only.

Tab 5: Valuation — Historical Context. API-driven benchmarking against 5-year medians. Metals and Mining sector showing Premium Priced verdict. Four multiples: PE Ratio (Not Key Metric, +123.2%), EV/EBITDA (Primary, +108.5%), Price/Book (Important, +172.0%), Mkt Cap/Sales (Not Key Metric, +109.1%). 4 of 4 multiples rated, 4 Above Median

Lazy Loading

Data is fetched only when you first click the Valuation tab. A loading spinner appears ("Fetching valuation data...") while up to 4 API calls execute (one per multiple). Results are cached — switching tabs and returning is instant. Each metric is fetched independently via Promise.allSettled, so one failure doesn't block the others.

The Four Multiples & 5-Year Median

MultipleFormulaBest ForNot Useful For
PE RatioMarket Price / EPSStable, profitable companies (IT, FMCG, Manufacturing)Loss-making, cyclical (metals), banking
EV/EBITDAEnterprise Value / EBITDACapital-intensive businesses (infrastructure, metals, telecom)Financial companies (banks, NBFCs)
Price/BookMarket Price / Book Value per ShareBanks, NBFCs, asset-heavy industriesAsset-light businesses (IT, services)
Mkt Cap/SalesMarket Cap / Annual RevenueGrowth-phase companies, fintech, FMCGBanking, metals, infrastructure

Deviation Calculation

The 5-year median is computed client-side from ~1,200 daily data points. Deviation = (Current - Median) / |Median| × 100. The absolute value in the denominator prevents negative medians from flipping the sign.

Status Badges

Sector-Aware Weighted Verdicts

Sector-Aware Intelligence: Weighted verdicts based on industry relevance. Premium Priced verdict showing EV/EBITDA as Important, PE Ratio as Not Key Metric. Logic table: Banks use Price/Book as Primary; Fintech uses Mkt Cap/Sales as Primary; General uses balanced weighting

This is the most powerful feature. Instead of treating all 4 multiples equally, the verdict weights each by sector relevance using a 0–3 scale:

WeightLabelCard AppearanceVerdict Impact
3PrimaryNormal card, gold tagDominates the verdict
2ImportantNormal card, blue tagStrong influence
1SupplementaryNormal card, gray tagMinor influence
0Not Key MetricDimmed (45% opacity)Excluded from verdict

Key Sector Weights

SectorPEEV/EBITDAP/BMkt Cap/SalesPrimary Metric
Banking/NBFC0030Price/Book only
IT Services3202PE Ratio
Metals0320EV/EBITDA
Telecom0300EV/EBITDA (only)
Fintech2103Mkt Cap/Sales
Manufacturing3211PE Ratio
FMCG3202PE Ratio
Infrastructure2310EV/EBITDA

Verdict Badges

Why This Matters — The Banking Example: Without sector awareness, a bank with PE above median, EV/EBITDA above median, and P/B below median would show "Premium Priced" (2 vs 1 simple counting). But PE and EV/EBITDA are meaningless for banks! With sector-aware weighting, only P/B (weight 3) matters. The verdict correctly shows "Mostly Undervalued" because the primary metric is below median. The tool ignores the noise and focuses on the signal.

PEG Ratio: Growth-Adjusted Valuation

Benchmarks and PEG Ratio: PEG of 2.15 flagged as Overvalued. Formula: PE Ratio 77.5 / Profit CAGR 36% = 2.15. NIFTY 50 Benchmark showing Company PE 77.5 vs NIFTY 50 at 22.6

The PEG ratio adjusts the PE multiple for earnings growth: PEG = Current PE / Profit CAGR (%). PE source: API data first, falls back to DOM extraction from "#top-ratios" ("Stock P/E"). Growth source: 5Y Compounded Profit Growth preferred, 3Y fallback.

PEG RangeStatusColorInterpretation
< 0.5Deeply UndervaluedDark GreenGetting growth practically for free
0.5 – 1.0UndervaluedGreenGrowth not fully priced in
1.0 – 1.5Fairly ValuedBlueReasonably priced for growth
1.5 – 2.0Getting ExpensiveAmberHigh expectations priced in
> 2.0OvervaluedRedPaying too much for growth

The PEG card shows the computed value, status badge, breakdown formula (e.g., "PE (44.8) ÷ Profit CAGR 5Y (36.4%) = PEG 1.23"), and a plain-English insight. PEG is not computed if PE is negative, profit growth is zero or negative, or data is unavailable.

NIFTY 50 Benchmark Comparison

The benchmark panel compares the company's PE and P/B against the NIFTY 50 index, providing broader market context:

BandRangeColorMeaning
Significant Premium> +75%RedCompany trades far above market levels
Moderate Premium+25% to +75%AmberCompany trades above market levels
In Line with Market-25% to +25%BlueCompany trades near market levels
Discount to Market< -25%GreenCompany trades below market levels

When the historical verdict and market comparison point in different directions, an interpretive context line resolves the conflict: "Trading below its historical median while remaining at a premium to broader market valuations." This bridges the mental gap — it tells you the stock is cheap for itself but still expensive vs the average company.

Critical Design Choice: The NIFTY benchmark is informational only — it does NOT change the main verdict badge. If it did, every IT company, every FMCG company, and every high-growth stock would be permanently flagged as overvalued. High-quality stocks should trade at a premium to the market. The verdict measures intrinsic history; the benchmark provides market context. Two separate but complementary conversations.
REAL WORLD

Sector Intelligence in Action — 7 Companies, 6 Sectors, 3 Verdicts

Theory is useful. Seeing the framework in action across real companies is transformative. Below are real screenshots from 7 companies spanning 6 different sectors — showing how the same extension adapts its analysis based on industry context. Notice how the sector badge, relevance tags, metric weights, and final verdict all change dynamically.

Vedanta — Metals & Mining: "Premium Priced"

For cyclical metal companies, PE is unreliable (marked "Not Key Metric" with weight 0). EV/EBITDA is the primary valuation multiple. Despite a PEG of 12.50, the sector note explains: "For cyclical metals companies, PE is unreliable. EV/EBITDA and Price/Book are preferred."

Vedanta Valuation: Premium Priced verdict — Metals & Mining sector with EV/EBITDA as PRIMARY (+108.5%), Price/Book as IMPORTANT (+172.0%), and PE Ratio dimmed as Not Key Metric
Vedanta Valuation detail: PEG 12.50 (Overvalued), Detailed Comparison table with sector relevance tags, NIFTY 50 Benchmark showing +335% PE premium and +140% P/B premium

Bajaj Finserv — NBFC: "Mostly Undervalued"

For NBFCs, Price/Book is the only metric that matters (marked PRIMARY with weight 3). PE, EV/EBITDA, and Mkt Cap/Sales are all dimmed. The sector note reads: "For NBFCs, Price/Book is the primary valuation metric." Health Score: 63 (Average) with only Profit CAGR as a strength.

Bajaj Finserv Valuation: Mostly Undervalued verdict — NBFC sector with Price/Book as PRIMARY (-17.3% Below Median), all other metrics dimmed
Bajaj Finserv Quick Analysis: NBFC sector badge, Health Score 63 (Average), 1 Strength (Profit CAGR 21.1%), ROCE 11%, OPM 37%

Adani Green Energy — Energy & Utilities: "Mostly Undervalued"

All four multiples are below their 5-year medians — a strong undervaluation signal. For energy companies, EV/EBITDA is the primary metric. PEG of 0.77 (Undervalued) confirms: earnings growth is outpacing the valuation. Health Score: 91 (Excellent) with 3 strengths and 0 concerns.

Adani Green Energy Valuation: Mostly Undervalued — Energy & Utilities with all 4 multiples Below Median. PE -53.3%, EV/EBITDA -42.9% (PRIMARY), Price/Book -77.0%, Mkt Cap/Sales -55.6%
Adani Green Energy Quick Analysis: Energy & Utilities sector, Health Score 91 (Excellent), 3 Strengths (Revenue CAGR 32%, Profit CAGR 59.1%, Operating Cash Flow Positive 9 Years), ROCE 9%, OPM 82%

InterGlobe Aviation (IndiGo) — General: "Premium Priced"

IndiGo falls into the "General" sector profile where all four multiples carry balanced weights. All metrics are above median, driving the "Premium Priced" verdict. Yet the PEG of 0.80 (Undervalued) tells a different story — this is where the PEG ratio adds nuance that median-only analysis misses. The NIFTY benchmark shows a +88% PE Significant Premium.

IndiGo Valuation: Premium Priced verdict — General sector with PE +154.5% (PRIMARY), EV/EBITDA -13.4% (IMPORTANT), Price/Book +369.0%, Mkt Cap/Sales -4.2%. PEG 0.80 (Undervalued)
IndiGo Quick Analysis: General sector, Health Score 63 (Average), 1 Strength (Revenue CAGR 42%), ROCE 17%, OPM 20%

Affle India — IT Services: "Mostly Undervalued"

For IT companies, PE and EV/EBITDA are both primary metrics. All four multiples are below their 5-year medians. The sector note: "For IT companies, PE and EV/EBITDA are primary. Price/Book is less relevant for asset-light businesses." PEG of 1.24 sits in the "Fairly Valued" zone, adding a balanced perspective.

Affle India Valuation: Mostly Undervalued — IT Services sector with PE -20.6% (PRIMARY), EV/EBITDA -25.6% (IMPORTANT), Price/Book -35.8%, Mkt Cap/Sales -22.1% (IMPORTANT). PEG 1.24 (Fairly Valued)
Affle India Quick Analysis: IT Services sector badge, Health Score and strengths overview

AVI Products — General: "Fairly Valued"

When multiples split between Above and Below Median, the verdict lands on "Fairly Valued" — the most balanced outcome. Note the PE and EV/EBITDA cards: PE has no current data (dash), and EV/EBITDA is negative (-9.3) which gets flagged as "Above Median" at -155%. The system handles edge cases gracefully.

AVI Products Valuation: Fairly Valued verdict — 3 of 4 multiples rated. PE unavailable, EV/EBITDA negative (-9.3), Price/Book +14.3% Above Median, Mkt Cap/Sales +35.0% Above Median. PEG not available

Uber — Google Finance (Charts Only)

Google Finance companies get the full Charts experience but not the analysis tabs (which require Screener.in's structured data). Here are two views showing Uber's income statement and cash flow evolution — demonstrating that the dual-axis engine works identically across platforms.

Uber Income Statement on Google Finance: Revenue bars growing from $17B to $52B, EBITDA turning positive, NPM% line showing profitability turnaround to 19.33%
Uber Cash Flow on Google Finance: Free Cash Flow growing from $152M to $6.48B, Cash from Operations line showing dramatic improvement
The Pattern: Same extension, same logic, but completely different outputs across companies. The sector badge determines which metrics matter. The weighted scoring determines the verdict. The NIFTY benchmark provides market context. And the PEG ratio adds a growth dimension that pure multiples miss. This is what "sector-aware intelligence" means in practice — not one-size-fits-all, but calibrated analysis for every industry.
WALKTHROUGH

The 5-Tab Workflow in Action: Affle (India) Ltd

Theory is clear. Now let us walk through a single company across all five tabs to see how the complete analytical workflow builds a coherent investment thesis. We will use Affle (India) Ltd — an IT Services company — and analyze it exactly as you would in practice.

Step 1: Charts Tab — Visualize the Trends

Affle Charts Tab showing Annual P&L with Sales bars growing steadily, OPM% line, and Profit Before Tax bars

The chart instantly reveals a powerful growth story: Sales climbing consistently over the years with OPM% stabilizing around 21–23% after initially being higher, showing mature but healthy margins. Profit before tax shows a consistent upward trajectory. The dual-axis chart makes the revenue scale and margin trends equally visible — something a raw data table can never do.

Step 2: Quick Analysis Tab — The Health Check

Affle Quick Analysis showing IT Services sector badge, Health Score, Strengths and Concerns, CAGR analysis, and Trend Analysis

The IT Services sector badge appears automatically. The health score comes in strong with multiple strengths flagged and zero concerns. Revenue and Profit CAGR are both robust across multiple timeframes. The trend analysis shows increasing direction for key metrics. This is a textbook quality company passing the "Background Check."

Step 3: Calculated Ratios Tab — The Diagnostics

Affle Calculated Ratios showing Solvency, Profitability, Efficiency ratios and DuPont Analysis

The solvency picture is clean: low debt, strong interest coverage, healthy current ratio. Now look at the DuPont Analysis: the ROE comes from profit margins with almost zero reliance on debt. The low asset turnover is typical for IP/tech businesses — they generate revenue from intellectual property, not physical assets. This is a Quality Compounder profile.

Step 4: Price Analysis Tab — The Valuation Check

Affle Price Analysis showing Price vs Fundamentals badge, Cyclical Analysis, and 52-Week Risk Metrics

The Price vs Fundamentals panel reveals whether the market has priced in the company's growth. Check the Price/Profit Growth Ratio and the resulting badge. The Cyclical Analysis and Risk Metrics add timing and positioning context. Combined with Steps 2 and 3, we now know the company is healthy, the earnings are quality, and we have a price-vs-value assessment.

Step 5: Valuation Tab — The Final Verdict

Affle Valuation Tab: Sector-aware verdict with 4 multiples showing current vs 5-year median comparison, PE and EV/EBITDA as PRIMARY metrics for IT Services
Affle Valuation detail: PEG Ratio calculation, Detailed Comparison table with relevance tags, and NIFTY 50 Benchmark

The Valuation tab brings it all together with sector-aware intelligence. For IT Services, PE and EV/EBITDA are both primary metrics. All four multiples are compared against their 5-year medians. The PEG Ratio adds a growth dimension — validating whether the PE is justified by earnings growth. And the NIFTY 50 Benchmark provides broader market context.

The Complete Verdict: Five tabs, one coherent story. Charts showed the growth trajectory. Quick Analysis confirmed company health. Calculated Ratios verified the quality of earnings via DuPont. Price Analysis assessed price-vs-value dynamics. And Valuation provided sector-aware historical context with NIFTY benchmarking. No single tab could deliver this depth alone — the power is in the progression.
WORKFLOW

The Complete Analyst Workflow

The five tabs are designed to work as a complete end-to-end workflow. Here is the recommended analytical sequence:

  1. Quick Analysis first: Get the instant health score. If the score is below 40, you may want to skip to the next company unless you are specifically hunting turnarounds.
  2. Calculated Ratios second: Understand why the score is what it is. Check the DuPont Analysis to verify ROE quality. If you see a "Leveraged Growth" profile, proceed with extreme caution.
  3. Price Analysis third: Is the stock catching up or running ahead? Check cyclical patterns for timing. Assess risk metrics for entry positioning.
  4. Valuation fourth: Compare current multiples against 5-year medians with sector-aware weighting. Check the PEG ratio for growth-adjusted context. Review NIFTY benchmark for market comparison.
  5. Charts last: Now that you know what to look for, build targeted visualizations. Chart the specific metrics that matter for your thesis — margins, cash flow, shareholding trends.
Speed Screening: For rapid filtering, spend 10 seconds per company on Price Analysis (check the badge), 10 seconds on Quick Analysis (check the score), and only deep-dive into Calculated Ratios, Valuation, and Charts for companies that pass the initial screen. This transforms the tool from "30 minutes per company" into "30 seconds to filter, 5 minutes to deep-dive."
HELP

Troubleshooting & FAQ

Common Issues

Button not appearing

Quick Analysis / Calculated Ratios / Price Analysis / Valuation tabs not showing

These four tabs are Screener.in only. They do not appear on Google Finance because the site lacks sufficient data depth.

Valuation tab stuck on "Fetching valuation data..."

Wrong sector detected

The extension reads sector from the Peer Comparison breadcrumb. For conglomerates, the classification may not match. In Quick Analysis, use Settings > Sector Override for manual correction. The Valuation tab currently uses auto-detection only.

PEG shows "Not available"

Google Finance shows stale data after switching views

Click Refresh in the panel header, or use the Minimize-Restore cycle: Minimize → Switch view → Wait 2–3 seconds → Restore.

Charts look distorted

"Clear All" doesn't prevent metrics from coming back

"Clear All" only clears the current chart — saved preferences remain. Use "Reset Preferences" to clear both.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this extension really free?

Yes. 100% free, no premium tier, no subscriptions, no accounts required.

Does it collect my data?

No. Everything runs client-side. The only network calls are to the Screener.in Chart API (Valuation tab), and those go directly to Screener.in's servers — not to Finmagine.

Can I compare multiple companies on one chart?

Not on one chart, but you can screenshot each company's analysis and compare side-by-side. Metric persistence makes this fast — your selections carry over automatically.

How many metrics can I plot?

Maximum 10 (limited by the color palette). For readability, 3–5 is recommended.

Can I use this on mobile?

No. Chrome extensions require desktop browsers.

Can I use this on Yahoo Finance or NSE?

No. The manifest only matches Screener.in and Google Finance. Adding new sites requires new extractors.

You Are Now a Finmagine Power Analyst

You have now explored every tab, every button, every metric, every threshold, and every workflow in the Finmagine Financial Chart Builder v2.2.0. Here is what you can now do:

The Edge: Data is abundant and free. The edge is entirely about the story you can read in that data. Finmagine automates the looking so you can spend all your time on the thinking. It knows what to measure, what to ignore, and what to flag — sector by sector, metric by metric. But the final investment decision is always yours. The tool gives you the map; you drive the car.
COMPLETE v2.2.0 TUTORIAL

Next Steps:

  1. Install the extension and practice on companies you know well
  2. Work through all five tabs sequentially: Charts → Quick Analysis → Calculated Ratios → Price Analysis → Valuation
  3. Use the 74 flashcards above to test your knowledge
  4. Build sector-specific analytical templates for your watchlist
  5. Explore more tools and resources at finmagine.com

Explore the Complete Chart Builder Hub

Discover all Chart Builder resources — tutorials, Google Finance integration, case studies, and more. Transform Screener.in & Google Finance data into professional charts.

Visit Chart Builder Hub →
← Back to Blog Hub